Momentic is a growth-focused SEO and digital strategy consultancy that finds the moments that matter. Our people-first, data-led, and future-facing team combines deep research with real-world instincts to capture demand and turn intent into measurable outcomes. Momentic is a registered trademark of Momentic LLC, and this is its official website.
  • arrow_forwardAbout
  • arrow_forwardWork
  • arrow_forwardTeam
  • Resources
    BlogIndustry NewsGoogle Algo Updates TrackerBest Practices
  • Let's Talk
< Back to all news updates

Tyler

September 2, 2025 5:54 PM
posted in #seo-news

Interesting. The court document says, “Google will not be required to share granular, query-level data with

advertisers or provide them with more access to such data. Nor will it have to restore an “exact match” keyword bidding option.” More black box search data.

And for the search data it has to share with competitors, “Google will have to make available to Qualified Competitors certain search index and user-interaction data, though not ads data…”

Qualified Competitor is likely not OpenAI. (p 103)

I’ll have to read again, but…

(starting page 129) Google has to share specific datasets with Qualified Competitors at a cost. pages 145-146 - Google has to do a one-time dump of their Search Index data - DocID for each web page, the URL mapping, when they first saw it, when they last crawled it, spam scores, and if it’s mobile or desktop.

Court rejected sharing popularity and quality signals aka ranking signals (pp 143-144). Court said they’re “largely a product of engineering and innovation” and Google shouldn’t have to give those up.

For User-side Data (pages 157-158), Google has to share Glue data (what people click on, what they hover over, how long they stay on pages) and RankEmbed training data a couple times over the 10 years. They don’t have to share the models and signals built from the data - but do need to share click patterns.

Knowledge Graph was rejected (pages 149-151). The court said Google’s Knowledge Graph wasn’t built from the user data Google got through its illegal distribution deals, so competitors don’t get it. Funny because I actually think this is Google’s best asset.

Google has to anonymize all this data for privacy (pp 164). But when you anonymize data to protect users, you destroy most of its value. The court references when Google had to share data in Europe under their Digital Marketing Act - the privacy filters removed 99% of searches from the dataset (pp 161).

So if I’m reading this right…

Court orders Google to share user click data to help competitors compete, then admits privacy filters will remove 99% of it. Google gets to keep its data monopoly, look like they’re being cooperative, and nothing changes. Ha!

1756853661.148939

Recent content from the team

June 24, 2025
The Influenceable Web
Tyler Einberger
May 4, 2025
Google vs. ChatGPT
Tyler Einberger
April 25, 2025
AI user-agents, bots, and crawlers to watch (April 2025 update)
Tyler Einberger
February 5, 2025
Using @id in Schema.org Markup for SEO & Knowledge Graphs
Tyler Einberger
December 20, 2024
Interpreting "SEO Issues" in Your Page Titles & Meta Tags
Tamara Hellgren
See all resources >
Momentic badge logo, official; updated in 2024
Momentic AI
AI Strategy
GEO
Momentic AGENCY Services
SEO
Content
Data
WebAdvanced Technical SEOMigrations & Redesigns
Momentic intelligence
Audience Intelligence
Business Intelligence
Resources
BlogNews FeedCase StudiesAboutTeamCareers
COntact
info@momenticmarketing.com414-488-9140

Momentic
‍
316 N Milwaukee St, #350, Milwaukee, WI 53202
‍
Open Monday - Friday, 8:00am - 5:00pm CT

Official Momentic logo, stacked; updated in 2024
Terms of UseCookie PolicyPrivacy PolicyContact
© 2025 Momentic, LLC. All rights reserved. Momentic™ is a registered trademark of Momentic, LLC. Unauthorized use, reproduction, or distribution of this trademark is strictly prohibited.
Book SEO Consultation